Drawing for FS²

USPTO serial 79238032

FS²

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MICHOS, JOHN E
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with FS²?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JULIE A KATZ

JULIE A KATZ KATZ GROUP LLC1711 N HERMITAGE AVECHICAGO, IL 60622UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Machine-readable data carriers recorded with programs, computer programs and software for business finance and accountancy; computer software for handling business processes and electronic trade via a global computer network in the field of business finance and accountancy; application software for cloud computing, in the field of business finance and accountancy; downloadable software for payment information between customer businesses and their principal bank; downloadable online computer software applications to automate business processes in the field of finance and accountancyABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 22, 2025FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 28, 2025FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 28, 2025FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 28, 2024MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION
Oct 28, 2024ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Oct 28, 2024OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Aug 12, 2024OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Jun 5, 2021ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jan 24, 2020OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 8, 2020OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jan 8, 2020OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 13, 2019RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 16, 2019OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Aug 15, 2019OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB
Aug 15, 2019OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED
May 7, 2019ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Apr 16, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Apr 16, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 27, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Mar 4, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 22, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 22, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 22, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 15, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 24, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Aug 24, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Aug 15, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Aug 14, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Aug 7, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 7, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 6, 2018LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED
Aug 2, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance