Drawing for BLUEWATER

USPTO serial 79244476

BLUEWATER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 119

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 600: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BLUEWATER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

M. Scott Alprin

M. Scott Alprin Alprin Law Offices, P.C.5 Pinehurst Circle, N.W.Washington, DC 20015United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Water bottles sold empty, not sold, marketed, or for use in conjunction or connection with household and to-go containers for food or with lunch bagsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 9, 2025IRRHIRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU
Sep 8, 2025IRFIIRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB
Aug 25, 2025FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 23, 2025FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 23, 2024MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE
Aug 18, 2024ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE
Aug 10, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 10, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 10, 2024ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Feb 16, 2024GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED
Feb 16, 2024GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED
Feb 16, 2024CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN
Jan 19, 2024RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Jun 27, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jun 24, 2023RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Dec 8, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Nov 17, 2022RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
May 10, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 23, 2022GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Mar 23, 2022GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Mar 23, 2022CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Sep 23, 2021GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED
Sep 23, 2021GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED
Sep 23, 2021CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN
Aug 25, 2021RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Dec 10, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Sep 26, 2020FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 30, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Apr 17, 2020OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 1, 2020OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Apr 1, 2020OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 13, 2019GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 22, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Nov 22, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Nov 22, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Nov 12, 2019DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Nov 7, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Nov 4, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 4, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 28, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 23, 2019DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Oct 23, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Oct 23, 2019ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED
Oct 4, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Oct 4, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 4, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 2, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 31, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 31, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 11, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jun 11, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 28, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 28, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 15, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 29, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Nov 28, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Nov 13, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Nov 13, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Nov 12, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 7, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 5, 2018LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED
Nov 1, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance