Drawing for INTELLIGENT CARE

USPTO serial 79245496

INTELLIGENT CARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PODESTA, GIDETTE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTELLIGENT CARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul A. Keller/Jessica S. Sachs

Paul A. Keller/Jessica S. Sachs Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C.5445 Corporate DriveSuite 200Troy, MI 48098

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009apparatus and instruments for measuring and recording weight, temperature, distance and directions, namely, scales, data processing apparatus, laser distance meters; portable apparatus and instruments for measuring and recording weight, temperature, distance and directions, namely, scales, data processing apparatus, laser distance meters, thermometers not for medical purposes; electronic transmitters and receivers for emergency signals; wireless communications devices, namely, radios, cellular phones, smartphones; radios; audio visual apparatus, namely, receiver for audio and video; data processing apparatus; wearable activity trackers, and wearable health trackers being wearable computers in the nature of smart watches, bracelets, wristbands, brooches; wearable communication devices, namely, wearable computers and cameras; communication hubs; electric relays; electric switches, namely, electric remote multi switchesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 9, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2021FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 13, 2021FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 13, 2021FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 13, 2020MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Oct 13, 2020ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 12, 2020EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
May 1, 2020OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 17, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 17, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 17, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 15, 2020OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 15, 2020OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 24, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 7, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 22, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 4, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 4, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 24, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 23, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 23, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 19, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance