USPTO serial 79248369
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | Electronic cigarettes; cases for electronic cigarettes; cases for electronic cigarette accessories; cigarettes; cigars; smokers' mouthpieces for electronic cigarettes; flavorings, other than essential oils, for use in electronic cigarettes; oral vaporizers for smoking tobacco; oral vaporizers for smoking purposes; oral vaporizers for smokers; cartridges sold filled with chemical flavorings in liquid form for electronic cigarettes; electronic cigarette liquid comprised of flavorings in liquid form, other than essential oils, used to refill electronic cigarette cartridges; liquid nicotine solutions for use in electronic cigarettes; tobacco substitutes; tobacco; cigarettes containing tobacco substances, not for medicinal purposes; ashtrays; lighters for smokers; smokers' articles, namely, cigarette cases, cigarette filters, cigarette rollers, cigarette papers, cigarette tubes, and matches; tobacco products, namely, leaf tobacco, flavored tobacco | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 27, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 27, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 16, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 4, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |