USPTO serial 79255272
STORM SHIELD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHAUD-KING, JILLIAN L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STORM SHIELD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard M. Goldberg
Richard M. Goldberg Goldberg Patent Law Office25 East Salem StreetSuite 419Hackensack, NJ 07601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | ADHESIVE FABRIC FOR APPLICATION BY HEAT; FABRICS FOR TEXTILE USE; FABRIC FOR FOOTWEAR; LINING FABRIC FOR FOOTWEAR; FELT; ELASTIC FABRICS FOR CLOTHING; PRINTED TEXTILE LABELS; MESH-WOVEN FABRICS; NARROW WOVEN FABRICS; NYLON FABRIC; MIXED FIBER FABRICS; SEMI-SYNTHETIC FIBER FABRICS; SYNTHETIC FIBER FABRICS; FABRICS MADE OF SYNTHETIC FIBERS; POLYESTER FABRIC; COTTON BASE MIXED FABRICS; JERSEY FABRICS FOR CLOTHING; LABELS OF TEXTILE FOR IDENTIFYING CLOTHING; LINEN LINING FABRIC FOR SHOES; GUMMED WATERPROOF CLOTH; TEXTILE LININGS FOR GARMENTS; FOULARD BEING FABRIC; TEXTILE FABRICS FOR USE IN MAKING CLOTHING; WATERPROOF MULTILAYER FABRIC FOR MANUFACTURING CLOTHING; FABRICS MADE OF SYNTHETIC FIBERS FOR CLOTHING, FOR CLOTHING FOR SPORTS, AND FOR FOOTWEAR; WATERPROOF FABRIC FOR MANUFACTURING CLOTHING; MOISTURE-WICKING FABRIC BEING MOISTURE ABSORBENT MICROFIBER TEXTILE FABRICS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF CLOTHING; TEXTILE FABRICS, NAMELY, MOISTURE-WICKING FABRIC, FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF CLOTHING | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | BELTS FOR CLOTHING; GLOVES FOR CLOTHING; MUFFS FOR CLOTHING; EAR MUFFS FOR CLOTHING; CUFFS; HEADBANDS FOR CLOTHING; SHOES; SPORTS SHOES; SPORTS SINGLETS; VISORS FOR HEADWEAR; HATS; BERETS; JERSEYS FOR CLOTHING; HEELPIECES FOR STOCKINGS; JACKETS FOR CLOTHING; SCARFS; BANDANAS, namely, NECKERCHIEFS; UNIFORMS; CLOTHING FOR SPORTS, NAMELY, PANTS, SHIRTS, SHORTS; SPORTS SOCKS; SPORT COATS; PADDED SHORTS FOR ATHLETIC USE; BRALETTES; TRACKSUITS; MOISTURE-WICKING SPORTS SHIRTS; MOISTURE-WICKING SPORTS PANTS; MOISTURE-WICKING SPORTS BRAS; TOE BOXES; WAIST BELTS FOR CLOTHING; SHOULDER WRAPS FOR CLOTHING; SKI BALACLAVAS; ARM WARMERS FOR CLOTHING; EARBANDS FOR CLOTHING; JUMPSUITS FOR CLOTHING; THERMAL CLOTHING, NAMELY, SHIRTS, PANTS, LONG UNDERWEAR; THERMAL SOCKS; THERMAL HEADGEAR; BASELAYER TOPS; BASELAYER BOTTOMS; TRACKSUITS; THERMAL UNDERWEAR; TRIATHLON CLOTHING, NAMELY, SHORTS, SHIRTS, TANK TOPS, SINGLETS; CYCLISTS' JERSEYS; BICYCLE GLOVES; TECHNICAL CLOTHING FOR SPORTS, NAMELY, SHORTS, SHIRTS, TANK TOPS; CYCLIST CLOTHING, NAMELY, UNIFORMS, PANTS, UNDERSHIRTS, SALOPPETES, CYCLIST JERSEYS, SPORT STOCKINGS, SPORT SWEARSHIRTS; WATERPROOF CLOTHING FOR CYCLISTS, NAMELY, JACKETS, PANTS, SHIRTS, HATS, CAPS, SHOE COVERS FOR USE WHEN WEARING SHOES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2026 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 29, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 16, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 16, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 13, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 31, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 25, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 1, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2019 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |