USPTO serial 79257670
HOTFORM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HOTFORM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory S. Lampert
Gregory S. Lampert LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLPP.O. Box 29001Glendale, CA 91209UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Industrial heat treatment installations, namely, heat treatment ovens and furnaces for metallic materials, quenching apparatus for heat treatment; Industrial furnaces, in particular bell furnaces; continuous furnaces, in particular continuous furnaces for hardening adhesives; Continuous and batch furnaces for hot stamping; Continuous and batch furnaces for press hardening; Continuous and batch furnaces for hot forming; multiple hearth furnace; rack cooking oven; press hardening devices, namely heated and cooled forming press devices; Continuous furnaces for tempering adhesives; Continuous furnaces for tempering and hardening varnishes; roller hearth furnaces; floater type furnaces; heating apparatus for industrial furnaces, namely, continuous aluminum solution heat treatment lines; heating apparatus for industrial furnaces, namely, continuous annealing lines; heating apparatus for industrial furnaces, namely, continuous heat treatment lines; heating apparatus for industrial furnaces, namely, solution heat treatment lines; homogenizing furnaces; reheating furnaces; chamber type furnaces; thermal treatment furnaces; heat treatment installations for metallic materials, in particular aluminum; Accelerated ageing furnaces; heating apparatus for industrial furnaces, namely, burners and radiant tubes for heat treatment of metallic materials; Flotation apparatus for furnaces sold as an integral part of flotation furnaces; cooling units for industrial purposes, namely Coolers for furnaces; Induction heated casting furnaces; Furnaces for recovering metals; Furnaces for preheating charges; Furnaces for melting metals; Furnaces for gas recovery purposes; heating apparatus, namely, rollers for roller hearth furnaces; Electric furnaces for metallurgical purposes; Automatic hardening furnaces for components; Hot blast furnaces; Gas fired combined furnaces for use in the production of steel; Gas fired combined hearth-type and shaft furnaces for use steel production | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Furnaces installation; repair and maintenance of industrial furnaces and conveyor systems, in particular for industrial furnaces systems; maintenance of industrial machinery, in particular of maintenance industrial furnaces and conveyor systems; machinery installation, maintenance and repair | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 4, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 15, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 3, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 5, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 5, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 11, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 10, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |