USPTO serial 79260112
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary J. Nelson
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer graphics software; Downloadable simulation software for use in digital computers in the field of vehicle control, aircraft control and training industrial processing, air traffic control, education, training, entertainment, aircraft flight simulation, helicopter flight simulation, truck simulation, car simulation, simulation of other vehicles, ship bridge simulation/training; downloadable computer software for aviation simulation, transport simulation, design visualization tools, defense simulation tools, scientific visualization tools, houses of worship visualization, emergency management; computing visual display units, namely, flexible flat panel displays for computers, curved panel displays for computers, projection displays of various shapes, monitors, display monitors, video display screens; video display screens, namely, curved displays, projection displays of various shapes; visual display units, namely, projection displays of various shapes; recorded computer software for computer graphics in the field of vehicle control, aircraft control, air traffic control, education, training, entertainment, project management, aircraft flight simulation, helicopter flight simulation, truck simulation, car simulation; simulation apparatus, namely, simulators for driving simulation of other vehicles, flight in the nature of air traffic control simulation and training, and driving ship bridge simulation and training; downloadable computer software for aviation simulation, transport simulation, design visualization tools, defense simulation tools, scientific visualization tools, house of worship visualization tools, emergency management; downloadable engineering design software; downloadable computer software drivers, namely, for enabling computer hardware and electronic devices to communicate with each other for display purposes, for aligning multiple projectors to provide a seamless image across multiple projection devices, for modifying and adapting the image shape of the displayed images, for modifying and adapting the image luminance of the displayed image, for modifying and adapting the image gamma values of the displayed image, and for modifying and adapting the image color of the displayed image; electronic LCD visual display units; simulation apparatus, namely, electronic simulators for vehicle control, aircraft control, air traffic control, education, training, entertainment, project management, aircraft flight simulation, helicopter flight simulation, truck simulation, car simulation, simulation of other vehicles, air traffic control simulation and training, ship bridge simulation and training, aviation simulation, transport simulation, design visualization tools, defense simulation tools, scientific visualization tools, house of worship visualization tools, emergency management, all of the foregoing in the nature of computer hardware and software-based teaching apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2024 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 28, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 11, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 11, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 19, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 20, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 14, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 30, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2019 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 13, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 12, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |