USPTO serial 79264629
APPLIED INNOVATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEREZ, STEVEN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with APPLIED INNOVATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer systems consulting, development of computer strategies for companies; technical advice and analysis in information systems and computer technologies; computer programming; conception (design) and development of software and software packages; update of software and software packages; advice with respect to computer software; technical support in connection with information technology; provision of online, non-downloadable operating software for accessing and using a cloud computing network; providing online non-downloadable software for operation and maintenance of computer networks and servers; providing, hosting, management, development and maintenance of applications, software, websites and databases; providing a full range of non-downloadable online application software for general and professional purposes; application service provider services, namely, providing, hosting, management, development and maintenance of applications, software, websites and databases; information technology consultancy services; computer systems integration services; support services in the field of software services; assistance relating to the processing, integration, modernization, migration, design, development, implementation, testing, optimization, management and operation of computer applications and assistance relating to the processing, integration, modernization, migration, design, development, implementation, testing, optimization, of information technology (IT); assistance in the field of cloud computing and extensive data storage; provision of temporary access to online, non-downloadable cloud computing software for data management and the electronic storage of data; design and development of computer hardware and software; software used as service provider services; provision of application services; platform services (PaaS); infrastructure as a service (IaaS) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 25, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 28, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 2, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |