Drawing for SWOOSH

USPTO serial 79276563

SWOOSH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SWOOSH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kenneth F. Florek

Kenneth F. Florek FLOREK & ENDRES PLLC1156 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Toilets; lavatories; toilets incorporating cisterns; toilets with washing functions; toilet stool units with a washing water squirter; water flushing installations, namely, flush toilets; flushing toilet tanksACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 1, 2022FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 16, 2021FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 16, 2021FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 4, 2021OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 16, 2021OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jun 16, 2021OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 16, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 16, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 3, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jun 3, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 3, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 12, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 11, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 11, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 10, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 24, 2020RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 24, 2020RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 10, 2020RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 9, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 22, 2020MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jan 18, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jan 16, 2020REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance