Drawing for EZPAK

USPTO serial 79287068

EZPAK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
OLANDRIA, WARREN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with EZPAK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID A.W. WONG

DAVID A.W. WONG BARNES & THORNBURG LLP11 SOUTH MERIDIAN STREETINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-3535UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Vitamins and nutritional supplements for general health and well-beingABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 11, 2026DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jun 11, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jan 30, 2024FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 5, 2024FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 5, 2024FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 5, 2023MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION
Jan 5, 2023ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Jan 5, 2023OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Jan 5, 2023OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Jan 1, 2022RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 15, 2021OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Dec 9, 2021OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB
Dec 9, 2021OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED
Dec 5, 2021OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 17, 2021OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Nov 17, 2021OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 25, 2021GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 20, 2021ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Oct 12, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 12, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 22, 2021OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Sep 22, 2021OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 22, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Sep 8, 2021RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Sep 7, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 2, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 29, 2021ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Jan 27, 2021GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 27, 2021GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 27, 2021CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jan 8, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 8, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 8, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 5, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 16, 2020RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Aug 15, 2020RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Aug 2, 2020RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Aug 1, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 16, 2020MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jun 12, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jun 11, 2020REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance