USPTO serial 79295218
PHYTOFLOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EISNACH, MICHAEL PATRICK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PHYTOFLOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Plant extracts for cosmetic use; non-medicated toiletry preparations and cosmetic products; non-medicated dentifrices; perfumery products, essential oils; bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use; cleaning, polishing, degreasing and abrasive preparations | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Plant extracts for pharmaceutical and dietetic use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 18, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 18, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 18, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 18, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 2021 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 17, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 14, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |