USPTO serial 79295444
SOFTWEAVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARR, PATRICK C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOFTWEAVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH G. CHU
JOSEPH G. CHU JCIP155 N LAKE AVENUE SUITE 800CENTURY SQUAREPASADENA, CA 91101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Adjustable seat carriers in the nature of collapsible platform seats; armchairs; Japanese style arm rests (kyosoku); chair beds; chair cushions; chair pads; chairs; chairs being seats; chairs being furniture; chairs being office furniture; chairs for computer workstations; computer furniture; contour chairs; cushions; air cushions, not for medical purposes; ergonomic furniture; furniture; furniture fittings, not of metal; furniture for computers; furniture for use in relation to computers; furniture for offices; furniture for the home; furniture upholstered in leather or imitation leather; head supporting pillows; pillows; reclining armchairs; reclining chairs; seats; swivel chairs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2022 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 24, 2022 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 24, 2022 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 24, 2022 | EXDD | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 31, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2022 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 29, 2022 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 26, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Mar 23, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 23, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 6, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 1, 2021 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 14, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 13, 2021 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 10, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 9, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |