USPTO serial 79295973
SAMLIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ARRISON, RACHEL MARIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SAMLIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Motorcycle lights; lights for automobiles; reflectors for automobiles; turn signal lamp for directional signals of automobiles; lighting apparatus and devices for automobiles; headlights for automobiles; bicycle lights; lamps for license plate of automobiles; rear combination lamps for automobiles; stop lamps for automobiles; back up lamps for automobiles; fog lamps for automobiles | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Direction signals for automobiles; rearview mirrors for automobiles; transmission lever for automobiles; parking brake lever for automobiles; pedals for automobiles; fuel tank cap for automobiles; washing devices, namely, nozzle for lamps of automobiles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 10, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 2021 | HSCD | HIDDEN SENSITIVE CONTENT | — |
| Nov 30, 2021 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2021 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Nov 16, 2021 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Nov 15, 2021 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 27, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 27, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 27, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 2021 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 4, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 3, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 2, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |