USPTO serial 79297177
MERLETTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KRAVTSOFF, ELENA V N
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MERLETTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Cookies; waffles; pastries; confectionery for decorating Christmas trees; fruit jelly candy as confectionery; cakes; peanut confectionery; almond confectionery; caramels as candy; sweetmeats as candy; liquorice as confectionery; peppermint sweets; crackers; lozenges as confectionery; confectionery, namely, pastilles; petits fours as cakes; biscuits; petit-beurre biscuits; fondants as confectionery; sugar confectionery; halvah | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 11, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 7, 2021 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 29, 2021 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 13, 2021 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 26, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 8, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 25, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2020 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2020 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |