USPTO serial 79298083
LITIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEHMER, JASON ROBERT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LITIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software, computer software and application software that can be downloaded or not via the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design, development and writing of software and software applications; design, development and writing on order of software for creation of Web pages on the Internet; advice on the aforesaid services; consultant services in the field of information technology; engineering services relating to information technology; computer specialist services; consultant services in the field of computer programming and information technology such as design and development of computers, software and databases and advice thereon; computer programming services; design and development of computer systems; consultations relating to computer hardware and software; automation advice (technical) and automation information; consulting services in the field of cloud computer networks and applications [cloud computing]; cloud computing; cloud hosting provider services; public service of cloud hosting providers; information technology (IT) consultancy; computer and information technology consulting services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 4, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 9, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2021 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 2, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 27, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2020 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2020 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 24, 2020 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2020 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 20, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2020 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |