USPTO serial 79299358
AFANASY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAVIS, MARC STEPHEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AFANASY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Aperitifs, non-alcoholic; lithia water; seltzer water; soda water; waters (beverages); aerated water; mineral water (beverages); table waters; kvass (non-alcoholic beverage); cocktails, non-alcoholic; lemonades; peanut milk (non-alcoholic beverage); milk of almonds (beverage); non-alcoholic beverages; isotonic beverages; non-alcoholic honey-based beverages; aloe vera drinks, non-alcoholic; whey beverages; non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages; fruit nectars, non-alcoholic; orgeat; beer; ginger beer; malt beer; powders for effervescing beverages; sarsaparilla (non-alcoholic beverage); syrups for lemonade; syrups for beverages; smoothies; tomato juice (beverage); cider, non-alcoholic; vegetable juices (beverages); fruit juices; preparations for making aerated water; preparations for making liqueurs; preparations for making mineral water; preparations for making beverages; must; grape must, unfermented; beer wort; malt wort; pastilles for effervescing beverages; sherbets (beverages); non-alcoholic fruit extracts; extracts of hops for making beer; essences for making beverages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 4, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 4, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 3, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 10, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 20, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 19, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2021 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 8, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 7, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2021 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2020 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |