USPTO serial 79303625
ALLELUIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FARRELL, ANNE M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ALLELUIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith A. Weltsch, Esq.
Keith A. Weltsch, Esq. Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C.400 Garden City PlazaSuite 300Garden City, NY 11530Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Jewels; cloisonné jewelry; jewelry for the head; precious and semi-precious jewels; rosaries; rosaries of noble metals; misbaha, being prayer beads; crosses, being jewelry and imitation jewellery; crucifixes as jewelry; amulets, being jewellery and imitation jewellery; rings, being jewellery and imitation jewellery; body-piercing rings; body-piercing studs; bangles; bracelets of precious metal; bracelets made of embroidered textile, being jewellery and imitation jewellery; chains, being jewellery and imitation jewellery; neck chains; ankle bracelets; necklaces, being jewellery and imitation jewellery; chokers; jewellery charms; pendants, being jewelry; wedding rings; tie clips; cuff links; lockets, being jewelry and imitation jewellery; earrings; jewelry, namely, tips of precious metal for bolo ties; pins, being jewellery and imitation jewellery; cloisonné pins; tie pins; ornamental lapel pins; brooches, being jewellery and imitation jewellery; jewellery hat pins; tiaras; cameos, being jewellery and imitation jewellery; clasps for jewelry; jewelry findings; shoe jewelry; hat jewelry; plastic jewelry; jewelry plated with precious metals; jewelry cases, being caskets, not of precious metal; presentation boxes for jewelry; jewelry boxes; jewelry rolls; key rings, being split rings with trinket or decorative fob; retractable key rings; split rings of precious metal for keys; charms for key rings; statues of precious metal; figurines of precious metal; busts of precious metal; figures of precious metal; model figures, being ornaments, made of precious metal; works of art of precious metal; medals; boxes of precious metal; crucifixes of precious metal, other than jewelry; jewelry, imitation jewelry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 6, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 6, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 17, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 11, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 1, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 23, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 22, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2021 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |