USPTO serial 79310245
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN S. EGBERT
JOHN S. EGBERT EGBERT, MCDANIEL & SWARTZ, PLLC1001 TEXAS AVE., SUITE 1250HOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Dried, preserved, canned, frozen fruits and vegetables; processed fruits and vegetables; tomato puree; tomato paste; processed and roasted chickpeas, nuts, peanuts, walnuts, pistachios; peanut butter; hazelnut spread; tahini; jams; marmalades; fruit jellies | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | Confectionery, namely, chocolate, candy, biscuits, wafers, crackers | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 26, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2022 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 22, 2022 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 22, 2022 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 22, 2022 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 7, 2022 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2022 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2022 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 3, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2022 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 31, 2022 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2022 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Dec 20, 2021 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2021 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 22, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2021 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 10, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 22, 2021 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2021 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2021 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2021 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 9, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 20, 2021 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2021 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 19, 2021 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 18, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2021 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |