Drawing for TIKI

USPTO serial 79311631

TIKI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TIKI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Greger

Jeffrey H. Greger Hauptman Ham, LLP2318 MILL RD.SUITE 1400Alexandria, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Laundry preparations; polishing preparations; degreasing preparations; abrasive preparations; soaps; perfumes; essential oils; cosmetics; hair lotions; dentifrices; depilatories; make-up removing products; lipstick; beauty masks; shaving products; preservatives for leather (polishes); creams for leatherACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 28, 2024FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 9, 2024FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 9, 2024FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 8, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 8, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 8, 2023ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 26, 2023GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
May 26, 2023GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 26, 2023CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 6, 2023RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Nov 20, 2022OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 2, 2022OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Nov 2, 2022OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 9, 2022GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Sep 9, 2022GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Sep 9, 2022CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Aug 9, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 9, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 9, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 9, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 1, 2022RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 9, 2022RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Feb 9, 2022RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jan 19, 2022RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jan 18, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 1, 2021MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
May 28, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 27, 2021REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance