Drawing for SMILEY TOUCH

USPTO serial 79325502

SMILEY TOUCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 760
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LAVACHE, LINDA M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMILEY TOUCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN C. HOLMAN

JOHN C. HOLMAN DUNLAP BENNETT & LUDWIG PLLC400 7TH ST., NW, STE. 700WASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; calculating machines; downloadable and recorded computer software for gathering, measuring, analyzing and presenting demographic data; downloadable computer software that allows people or organizations to create a voting event, vote on the issue, change their vote at will and track the input and display it in a graphical way; downloadable and recorded computer software that provides real-time, integrated business management intelligence by combining information from various databases and presenting it in an user interface; downloadable and recorded computer software for conducting customer satisfaction surveys; downloadable and recorded computer software for conducting personnel satisfaction surveysACTIVE
035Preparing and conducting personnel satisfaction surveys via a global computer network as support services for marketing, business management and business administration; arranging of public voting and public opinion polling events; public opinion polling services; rental of electronic voting machines and electronic opinion polling machinesACTIVE
042Industrial analysis and research services in the field of computer hardware and software relating to satisfaction surveys, demographics, voting and opinion polling; design and development of computer hardware and software; design of electronic voting machines and electronic opinion polling machines; update and maintenance of computer software; information technology (IT) consulting services; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable operating software for computer networks and servers for customer and personnel satisfaction surveys; computer services, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of knowledge management to host computer application software for creating searchable databases of information and data to allow users to perform, on-line, the collecting and analyzing of different types of opinion surveysACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 18, 2026GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Aug 18, 2026GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Aug 18, 2026CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Jul 14, 2026JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Dec 19, 2025GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Dec 19, 2025GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Dec 19, 2025CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Nov 18, 2025EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Nov 18, 2025JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Nov 18, 2025EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Nov 17, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 17, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 17, 2025ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
May 16, 2025GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
May 16, 2025GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 16, 2025CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 21, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Mar 8, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Sep 8, 2023GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Sep 8, 2023GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Sep 8, 2023CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Aug 11, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 10, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 10, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 1, 2023OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 12, 2023OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Apr 12, 2023OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 14, 2023RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 10, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 23, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 23, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 13, 2022RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 23, 2022RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 23, 2022RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 18, 2022RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 17, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 19, 2021MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Nov 15, 2021NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 11, 2021REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance