USPTO serial 79325914
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN C. HOLMAN
JOHN C. HOLMAN DUNLAP BENNETT & LUDWIG PLLC400 7TH ST., NW, STE. 700WASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; calculating machines; downloadable and recorded computer software for gathering, measuring, analyzing and presenting demographic data; downloadable computer software that allows people or organizations to create a voting event, vote on the issue, change their vote at will and track the input and display it in a graphical way; downloadable and recorded computer software that provides real-time, integrated business management intelligence by combining information from various databases and presenting it in an user interface; downloadable and recorded computer software for conducting customer satisfaction surveys; downloadable and recorded computer software for conducting personnel satisfaction surveys | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Preparing and conducting personnel satisfaction surveys via a global computer network as support services for marketing, business management and business administration; arranging of public voting and public opinion polling events; public opinion polling services; rental of electronic voting machines and electronic opinion polling machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Industrial analysis and research services in the field of computer hardware and software relating to satisfaction surveys, demographics, voting and opinion polling; design and development of computer hardware and software; design of electronic voting machines and electronic opinion polling machines; update and maintenance of computer software; information technology (IT) consulting services; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable operating software for computer networks and servers for customer and personnel satisfaction surveys; computer services, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of knowledge management to host computer application software for creating searchable databases of information and data to allow users to perform, on-line, the collecting and analyzing of different types of opinion surveys | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2026 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 23, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 19, 2025 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2025 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2025 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 18, 2025 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2025 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 18, 2025 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 17, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2025 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 16, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 16, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 21, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 8, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 8, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 18, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 17, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |