USPTO serial 79328042
ORIGAMI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, CYNTHIA RINALDI
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ORIGAMI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machine tools, in particular for processing materials by means of a laser; mechanical installations, namely, for processing materials by means of a laser | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Lasers or laser amplifiers for non-medical use, in particular for applications within manufacturing, material processing, optical pumping and LIDAR (Light Detection and Ranging); lasers for non-medical use, in particular lasers providing fs-, ps- or ns pulses, high-power lasers, fiber lasers and narrow linewidth lasers; laser amplifiers for non-medical use, in particular laser amplifiers based on optical fiber amplifier modules; modules for second-harmonic generation; computer programs and software for controlling a laser or a laser amplifier; accessories and fittings for the aforesaid goods included in this class | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Lasers or laser amplifiers for medical use, in particular for applications within optogenetics, ophthalmology or biomedical imaging; pulsed lasers for medical use, in particular lasers providing fs-, ps- or ns pulses; high-power lasers for medical use; fiber lasers for medical use; narrow linewidth lasers for medical use; laser amplifiers for medical use, in particular laser amplifiers based on optical fiber amplifier modules; modules for second-harmonic generation for medical use; accessories and fittings for the aforesaid goods included in this class | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 30, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 10, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 10, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 26, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 26, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 19, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 18, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |