USPTO serial 79329984
UNCOVERY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EISNACH, MICHAEL PATRICK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UNCOVERY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software; application software; software for cloud computing; smart manufacturing software; data mapping software; application software for cloud computing services; software for network security; information retrieval applications; mapping software; technical asset mapping software; technical asset identification software; technical asset monitoring software; none of the aforesaid goods being for and/or in connection with interactive entertainment services, interactive game software, interactive game hardware, computer game software, computer game hardware, video game software, video game hardware | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Developing and creating software; installation, maintenance of software; software programming services; development, programming and implementation of software; monitoring services of computer systems; monitoring of computer security systems; software as a service [SaaS]; support services in the field of software as a service (SaaS); advisory services in the field of security software; design and development of operating software for cloud computer networks; design and development of Internet security programs; information technology services; cloud computing services; computer programming; technical advice services in the field of information technology and telecommunications; consultation regarding computer security; none of the aforesaid services being for and/or in connection with interactive entertainment services, interactive game software, interactive game hardware, computer game software, computer game hardware, video game software, video game hardware | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2024 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 20, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 19, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 31, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 31, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 18, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 18, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 18, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 8, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |