USPTO serial 79336482
RUCKUZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHINER, MARK W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RUCKUZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Scarves; neckties; headwear; mufflers; winter gloves; shawls; footwear; socks; clothing; belts [clothing] | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Wholesale store services in relation to neckties; retail store services in relation to neckties; wholesale store services in relation to scarves; retail store services in relation to scarves; wholesale store services in relation to headwear; retail store services in relation to headwear; wholesale store services in relation to mufflers; retail store services in relation to mufflers; wholesale store services in relation to winter gloves; retail store services in relation to winter gloves; wholesale store services in relation to shawls; retail store services in relation to shawls; wholesale store services in relation to footwear; retail store services in relation to footwear; wholesale store services in relation to socks; retail store services in relation to socks; wholesale store services in relation to clothing; retail store services in relation to clothing; wholesale store services in relation to belts [clothing]; retail store services in relation to belts [clothing] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 23, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 23, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 8, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |