USPTO serial 79350843
MYSPOON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOZEAU, BRANDON THOMAS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MYSPOON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TIMUR SLONIM
TIMUR SLONIM Law Office of Timur E. Slonim, Esq.86 RENO AVENUESTATEN ISLAND, NY 10306Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Spoons being tableware | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Edible fats; peanut butter; butter; cocoa butter for cooking; coconut butter for cooking; butter cream being creamed butter for cooking; egg whites; raisins; processed dates; milk; palm kernel oil for cooking; sesame oil for cooking; egg yolks; whey; eggs; powdered eggs; olive oil for cooking; sunflower oil for cooking; ground almonds; coconut oil for cooking; prepared sunflower seeds; condensed milk; fermented milk; peanut milk for food purposes; almond milk for food purposes; rice milk; prepared hazelnuts; oat milk; spreads made from oleaginous fruits; soya oil for cooking; milk substitutes; coconut milk | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | PPasta; decorative confectionery products for the Christmas tree; aromatic food additives, namely, glucose; toasted bread; rusks; shortcake biscuits; Shortbread; sweet cookies; waffles; sweet buns; cocoa; coffee; cinnamon; caramels; cereal-based preparations, namely, breakfast cereals; chocolate; almond paste; cloves being spice; natural sweeteners; ginger cookies; flour; corn flour; barley meal; soya flour; wheat flour; starch for food; small cakes; cake flavorings, other than essential oils; cake powder mix; cake batters; glucose for food; almond biscuits being sweet pastries; honey; oat flakes; oatmeal; coffee- based beverages; cocoa-based beverages; chocolate-based beverages; substitutes for coffee; crackers; tea-based beverages; rice appetizers; high-protein cereal bars; cereal bars; pastry dough; chocolate decorations for cakes; crystallized sugar decorations for cakes; processed buckwheat; buckwheat flour | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2026 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2026 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2026 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 15, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 25, 2024 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2024 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2024 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2024 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2024 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2024 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 26, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 26, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 3, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 2, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2022 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |