USPTO serial 79355257
GENMAI DECAF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- UKAOMA, ULOMA JANET
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GENMAI DECAF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Shauna M. Wertheim
Shauna M. Wertheim The Marbury Law Group, PLLC11800 Sunrise Valley Drive15th FloorReston, VA 20191Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Bread comprised of brown rice; sweets being confectionery comprised of brown rice, not including fruits, vegetables, beans or nuts; brown rice coffee; brown rice; processed goods of brown rice, in the nature of prepared coffee powders made from brown rice ; roasted brown rice; roasted powdery brown rice | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2026 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2026 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2026 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 7, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2024 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2024 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2024 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2024 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 24, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2024 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2024 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2024 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2024 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 28, 2024 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2024 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 19, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 19, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 17, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 10, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 9, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |