USPTO serial 79356425
ROSELENA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICKS, AUDREY NICOLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROSELENA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 26, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 18, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 18, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2023 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 26, 2023 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 1, 2023 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 1, 2023 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| May 24, 2023 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 15, 2023 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 23, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 22, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2023 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |