USPTO serial 79356923
REALYTICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRYE, KIMBERLY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 100
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REALYTICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
P. Jay Hines
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business research; market intelligence services; market studies; marketing; marketing research; providing commercial information and advice for consumers in the choice of products and services; competitive intelligence services; compilation of company information into computer databases; targeted marketing; providing user rankings for commercial or advertising purposes; providing user reviews for commercial or advertising purposes; systemization of information into computer databases; web indexing for commercial or advertising purposes; consumer profiling for commercial or marketing purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Research in the field of artificial intelligence technology; software as a service [SaaS] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2025 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| May 17, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 13, 2025 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 21, 2025 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2025 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2025 | DCPN | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2025 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Oct 4, 2024 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Sep 27, 2024 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Sep 18, 2024 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 23, 2024 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2024 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Aug 23, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 23, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2024 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 8, 2024 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2024 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 20, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 20, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 13, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 16, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 15, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |