USPTO serial 79360321
SEER CLOUD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARMON, RAYMOND E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SEER CLOUD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Hosting an online web-based platform for medical purposes; hosting an online platform for the diagnosis, monitoring, management and treatment of neurological conditions; hosting an online platform for the diagnosis, monitoring, management and treatment of epilepsy, sleep and cardiac conditions; hosting an online platform for medical professionals to review, monitor, manage and treat patients with epilepsy, sleep or cardiac conditions; Software as a service (SaaS) for medical purposes; Platform as a service (PaaS) for medical purposes; hosting an online web-based platform for health purposes; Software as a service (SaaS) for health purposes; Platform as a service (PaaS) for health purposes; providing non-downloadable software for use in the provision of, and access to, medical treatment; providing non-downloadable software enabling the provision of diagnostic medical and health information for use in body monitoring including the management of epilepsy, heart and sleep disorder; providing non-downloadable software enabling the recording, collection, organisation, management and transmission of medical and health information for diagnostic body monitoring including the management of epilepsy, heart and sleep disorders; providing non-downloadable software for use with medical devices; providing non-downloadable software for use with medical diagnostic devices; providing non-downloadable software for use with health monitoring devices; providing non-downloadable software for use in the treatment and management of epilepsy; provision of non-downloadable database programs relating to diagnostic medical and health information for use in body monitoring including the management of epilepsy, heart and sleep disorders | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2025 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Oct 11, 2024 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2024 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 18, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 27, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 26, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2023 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |