USPTO serial 79360512
R ROBOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REEVES, APRIL ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with R ROBOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Bags; baby carriers [slings or harnesses]; diaper bags; sling bags for carrying babies; baby carriers worn on the body; purses; backpacks; travelling bags; bags for sports; handbags; briefcases for documents; key cases; umbrellas; parasols; dog clothing | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Infants' clothing; infantwear; clothing; footwear; hats; outerclothing; one-piece suits; mufflers; undergarments; sweaters; tee-shirts; socks; sports wear; winter face masks being clothing; belts for clothing; babies' bibs, not of paper; bathrobes; aprons being clothing; footmuffs for infants, not electrically heated; baby mittens, not electrically heated | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services in relation to bags; retail store services in relation to purses; retail store services in relation to footwear; retail store services in relation to children's clothing; retail store services in relation to clothing; retail store services in relation to hats; retail store services in relation to socks; retail store services in relation to belts for clothing; retail store services in relation to babies' bibs, not of paper; retail store services in relation to babies' bibs of paper; retail store services in relation to baby mittens, not electrically heated; retail store services in relation to footmuffs for infants, not electrically heated; retail store services in relation to trimmings for clothing; retail store services in relation to decorative articles for the hair; retail store services in relation to blanket throws; retail store services in relation to quilts; retail store services in relation to pillows; retail store services in relation to bath towels; retail store services for diaper changing pads, not of paper; retail store services in relation to disposable diaper changing mats for babies; retail store services in relation to teething rings, dummies and teats; retail store services in relation to teething rings for babies; retail store services in relation to teething soothers; retail store services in relation to babies' bottles; retail store services in relation to fruit feeders for babies; retail store services in relation to babies' diapers; retail store services in relation to dietary supplements for infants; retail store services in relation to baby shampoo; retail store services in relation to toothbrushes for babies; retail store services in relation to baby detergents; retail store services in relation to pre-moistened tissues of paper for babies; retail store services in relation to table knives, forks and spoons for babies; retail store services in relation to buckets for infants; retail store services in relation to baby bathtubs; retail store services in relation to baby baths; retail store services in relation to baby showers; retail store services in relation to baby gates; retail store services in relation to infant beds; retail store services in relation to crib bumpers being bed linen; retail store services in relation to car seats for babies; retail store services in relation to baby walkers; retail store services in relation to safety gates for infants; retail store services in relation to baby swings; retail store services in relation to baby toys; retail store services in relation to baby rattles; retail store services in relation to slides for infants; retail store services in relation to children's books; promoting the goods and services of others by means of operating an on-line comprehensive shopping mall; advertising; publicity | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2025 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2025 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 7, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 7, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 18, 2023 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 3, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 2, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |