USPTO serial 79361615
DTC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DTC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Glucose for culinary purposes; ground roasted coffee; instant coffee; cooking salt; fresh coffee; bread crumb; corn-based snack foods; gingerbread; flour-based snack foods; donuts; cakes; noodles; American fried rice; Basil fried rice; rice; butter corn kernels; Hainanese chicken rice; Jasmine rice; grilled chicken rice; Cantonese BBQ pork rice; cornflakes; custard; caramels; cookies; croissants; tea beverages; spices; black tea; rice porridge; ketchup; meat sauce; barbecue sauce; sushi; sandwiches; Dim Sum (terms too vague in the opinion of the International Bureau Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); cereal flour-based snack food; Dorayaki [Japanese sweet-filled pancakes]; brownies; cereal-based snack food; bread buns; pies; dessert puddings; pancakes; Foiy thong [Thai dessert of egg yolks thread cooked in boiled syrup]; waffles; wafers; dice bean cake; Thai desserts (terms too vague in the opinion of the International Bureau Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); fish flavored crisp rice (terms too vague in the opinion of the International Bureau Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); mooncakes; eclairs; fried chicken rice; vanilla flavorings for culinary purposes; nata de coco; vermicelli; sago; cinnamon; ice cream; macaroni; hamburger sandwiches; royal jelly for human consumption, not for medical purposes; tacos; cube sugar; fermented fish sauce for culinary purposes; sweet chili sauce; Sukiyaki sauce [Japanese hot pot sauce]; vinegar; spring rolls; dressings for salad; powdered spices; Tom Yum powder [condiment]; glutinous rice flour; shrimp Pad Thai [Thai stir-fried noodles]; Chinese five spices powder; grounded pepper; pasta; wasabi powder; Luk Chup [Thai sweet mung bean marzipan] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2025 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2025 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 11, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 16, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 15, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |