Drawing for INNIT

USPTO serial 79362294

INNIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 760
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TORPEY, KATHERINE ANN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 122

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INNIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KAREN KREIDER GAUNT

KAREN KREIDER GAUNT DINSMORE & SHOHL LLP255 EAST FIFTH STREET, SUITE 1900CINCINNATI, OH 45202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Information technology devices for storing, retrieving and sending information, namely computer hardware relating to the creation and processing of audio;; audio devices, namely, microphones, radio receivers, amplifiers, audio mixing consoles, electric and electronic effects units for musical instruments, headphones, audio speakers and audio circuit boards; multimedia devices, namely, multimedia projectors, multimedia accelerator boards, high definition multimedia interface splitters and high definition multimedia interface adapters, multimedia multiplexers, multimedia terminals, multimedia players and multimedia connectors; audio/visual devices, namely, audio/video receivers and audio and visual headsets; audiovisual apparatus, namely, audiovisual receivers and headsets; audio devices, namely, multi room audio devices being receivers, speakers, audio amplifiers and audio signal routers, audio receivers; headphones; headphone amplifiers; stereo headphones; wireless headphones; headphone-microphone combinations; in-ear headphones; noise cancelling headphones; recorded and downloadable software for processing images, graphics, audio, video and text; recorded and downloadable software for recording and transmission of sound; recorded and downloadable software for controlling and improving sound quality, namely, acoustics software; recorded and downloadable software for creating and editing sound; recorded and downloadable software for electronic signal amplification and signal transmission; recorded and downloadable software to enhance the audio-visual capabilities of multimedia applications, namely, for the integration of text, audio, graphics, still images, and moving pictures; recorded and downloadable application software for connecting and managing headphones and wireless devices; acoustic membranes used in sound recording or reproducing apparatus; acoustic transformersACTIVE—
042software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for recording and transmission of sound, for creating and editing sound, for controlling and improving sound quality, namely, acoustics software, for electronic signal amplification and signal transmission, for processing images, graphics, audio, video and text; software as a service (SaaS) services for enhancement of the audio-visual capabilities of multimedia applications for sound devices, multimedia devices, audio/visual devices, audiovisual apparatus, audio devices, audio receivers and audiovisual receivers and headphones; platform as a service (PaaS) featuring computer software platforms for transmission of images, audio-visual content, video content and messagesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 23, 2025GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2025GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2025CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 10, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 2025ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 3, 2025ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2025EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 3, 2025JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 3, 2025EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 3, 2024GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 3, 2024GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 3, 2024CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 12, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 12, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 12, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 3, 2024OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 12, 2024OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 12, 2024OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 23, 2024RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 13, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 25, 2023RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 5, 2023RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 5, 2023RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 26, 2023RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 25, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 14, 2023MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 10, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2023REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance