USPTO serial 79362294
INNIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 760
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TORPEY, KATHERINE ANN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INNIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Information technology devices for storing, retrieving and sending information, namely computer hardware relating to the creation and processing of audio;; audio devices, namely, microphones, radio receivers, amplifiers, audio mixing consoles, electric and electronic effects units for musical instruments, headphones, audio speakers and audio circuit boards; multimedia devices, namely, multimedia projectors, multimedia accelerator boards, high definition multimedia interface splitters and high definition multimedia interface adapters, multimedia multiplexers, multimedia terminals, multimedia players and multimedia connectors; audio/visual devices, namely, audio/video receivers and audio and visual headsets; audiovisual apparatus, namely, audiovisual receivers and headsets; audio devices, namely, multi room audio devices being receivers, speakers, audio amplifiers and audio signal routers, audio receivers; headphones; headphone amplifiers; stereo headphones; wireless headphones; headphone-microphone combinations; in-ear headphones; noise cancelling headphones; recorded and downloadable software for processing images, graphics, audio, video and text; recorded and downloadable software for recording and transmission of sound; recorded and downloadable software for controlling and improving sound quality, namely, acoustics software; recorded and downloadable software for creating and editing sound; recorded and downloadable software for electronic signal amplification and signal transmission; recorded and downloadable software to enhance the audio-visual capabilities of multimedia applications, namely, for the integration of text, audio, graphics, still images, and moving pictures; recorded and downloadable application software for connecting and managing headphones and wireless devices; acoustic membranes used in sound recording or reproducing apparatus; acoustic transformers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for recording and transmission of sound, for creating and editing sound, for controlling and improving sound quality, namely, acoustics software, for electronic signal amplification and signal transmission, for processing images, graphics, audio, video and text; software as a service (SaaS) services for enhancement of the audio-visual capabilities of multimedia applications for sound devices, multimedia devices, audio/visual devices, audiovisual apparatus, audio devices, audio receivers and audiovisual receivers and headphones; platform as a service (PaaS) featuring computer software platforms for transmission of images, audio-visual content, video content and messages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2025 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2025 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2025 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 10, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 3, 2025 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2025 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2025 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 3, 2025 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 3, 2024 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2024 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 3, 2024 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 12, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 3, 2024 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2024 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2024 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 13, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 26, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 25, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |