USPTO serial 79362461
COINFINITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLAZICH, JOAN MICHELE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COINFINITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial advice and consultancy services; currency trading; monetary affairs; services in connection with financial and monetary matters; financial transactions, in particular buying and selling of bitcoins and providing of financial information in the aforesaid field; conducting of currency exchange transactions; financial transactions; consultancy for businesses and public institutions with regard to introducing or using bitcoins (term considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); providing of an online marketplace for buyers and sellers of bitcoins (term considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); providing of financial information relating to currencies, in particular bitcoins; cryptocurrency trading services; cryptocurrency exchange services; financial brokerage services for cryptocurrency trading; financial consultation in the field of cryptocurrency; cryptocurrency payment processing; financial services, namely, electronic transfer of crypto assets; financial exchange of crypto assets | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design, development and programming of computer software; computer software consultancy; consultancy in the area of information technology (it); technological consultation services; establishing internet platforms for electronic commerce (term considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); electronic storage of cryptocurrency for others (term considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); technological consulting in the field of cryptocurrency; providing technology information in the field of cryptocurrency | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2025 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2025 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 1, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 1, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 7, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 15, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 14, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |