USPTO serial 79362527
TIDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARR, PATRICK C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TIDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Pushchairs; prams; strollers; buggies; bags adapted for pushchairs, prams, strollers and buggies; pushchairs for use with carry cots; car seats for babies, car seats for children; safety seats for children for vehicles; replacement parts, and fittings for all the aforesaid goods, namely, frame and chassis replacement parts therefor, namely, handle bars, brake pads, brakes springs (term considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations), prams bed fasteners (term considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations), sun canopy leather fobs (term considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations), wheels, nuts (term considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations), screws (term considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations) and bolts (term considered too vague by the International Bureau - Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); accessories for all the aforesaid goods, namely, car seat adaptors, hood and apron, bags adapted for pushchairs, car seat liner, car seat adaptors, cup holder, rain covers, covers for pushchairs, hoods for pushchairs, aprons for pushchairs, baskets for pushchairs, fold-up pushchairs, fitted foot muffs for pushchairs, bags adapted for pushchairs, harnesses for use with pushchairs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2025 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2025 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 29, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 6, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 5, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2023 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |