USPTO serial 79362625
BIJINDO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KETCHUM, BRENDAN J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIJINDO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Functional foods for medical purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Wholesale and retail of perfumes, cosmetics and sanitary preparations, household appliances, facial care and fumigation machinery and apparatus, and other equipment for human beauty care, foods (not including restaurant services), functional foods, medicines and medical equipment; retail services ordered by customers via airmail or Internet; services of product introduction and trade promotion | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Services of organizing sport and beauty competitions | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Massage services; sunbathing service; beauty salon services; consultancy services relating to health care; general and specialized clinic services, dentistry services; makeup services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NGUYEN QUYNH ANH
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named BIJINDO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2025 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2025 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 9, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 9, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 23, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 22, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2023 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |