USPTO serial 79363247
ADMATCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ADMATCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising agency services; advertising analysis; advertising; advertising services provided over the internet; advertising services provided via a data base; provision of information relating to advertising; all of the above relating to B2B advertising optimisation services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2025 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2025 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2024 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jun 26, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2023 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 20, 2023 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Oct 31, 2023 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Oct 30, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 29, 2023 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2023 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 26, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2023 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2023 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2023 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |