USPTO serial 79390205
BOOTDOC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUDSON, TAMARA BREE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BOOTDOC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ried im Innkreis, AT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SCOTT J. MAJOR
SCOTT J. MAJOR MILLEN WHITE ZELANO & BRANIGAN, PC2200 CLARENDON BLVD., 14TH FLOORARLINGTON, VA 22201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Shoes, in particular ski and snowboard shoes and structural and replacement parts thereof, boots for sports and leisure shoes; footwear, in particular sports insoles for footwear, other than for medical use; socks, in particular sports socks and trouser socks, all for use in athletics, high-performance range, winter sports, and year-round sports, namely, trekking, hiking, running and trail running; clothing, in particular sportswear and casualwear, namely, power fit socks, racing socks, hiking socks, trekking socks, running socks, trail running socks and winter sports socks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2026 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 3, 2026 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 3, 2026 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 23, 2026 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 7, 2026 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2026 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2026 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 23, 2025 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2025 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2025 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 22, 2025 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2025 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2025 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 8, 2025 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2025 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2025 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 8, 2025 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 10, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 15, 2025 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 30, 2025 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 18, 2025 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 7, 2025 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2025 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 8, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 24, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 15, 2024 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2024 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2024 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 6, 2024 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 5, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2024 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2024 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |