Drawing for VADO

USPTO serial 79391997

VADO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KUHN, RIO NICE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 127

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VADO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas M. McAllister

Douglas M. McAllister Lipsitz & McAllister, LLC755 Main Street, Building 8Monroe, CT 06468United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025FootwearACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2026CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Apr 23, 2026FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 2, 2026FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 2, 2026FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 5, 2025OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 20, 2025OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 20, 2025OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 2, 2025MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 2, 2025ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 7, 2024RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 16, 2024RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 16, 2024RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Sep 14, 2024RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 13, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2024RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW
Sep 6, 2024RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 5, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 2, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 2, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 2, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Apr 2, 2024CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Apr 2, 2024COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Mar 27, 2024MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Mar 23, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 21, 2024REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance