Drawing for WUNDERKIND

USPTO serial 79399194

WUNDERKIND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
YANG, KATRINA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 127

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with WUNDERKIND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy R DeWitt

Timothy R DeWitt 24IP Law Group USA, PLLC1905 Dulaney PlaceAnnapolis, MD 21409United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Golf balls; golf bags with or without wheels; golf bag trolleys; golf gloves; golf clubs; golf putters; golf club heads; golf club covers; golf club grips; golf club shafts; golf tees; golf ball markers; divot repair tools being golf accessories.ACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2026MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 17, 2026ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 18, 2025OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 3, 2025OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Dec 3, 2025OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 30, 2025GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Sep 30, 2025GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 30, 2025CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 28, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 28, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 28, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2025RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 13, 2025RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 13, 2025RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Feb 5, 2025RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Feb 4, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2025RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW
Jan 22, 2025RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jan 21, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 11, 2024MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jul 11, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 4, 2024REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance