USPTO serial 79416433
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amanda M. Prose
Amanda M. Prose WESTMAN, CHAMPLIN & KOEHLER, P.A.121 South Eighth Street, Suite 1100Minneapolis, MN 55402United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | optical apparatus and instruments, namely integrated circuits, optical cards; checking and monitoring apparatus and instruments, namely encryption devices, electronic security token to authenticate, pre-recorded electronic chipset featuring security software; digital media, namely pre-recorded electronic chipset featuring security software; data processing equipment; computers; recorded and downloadable software programs for preventing and avoiding cyber attacks for use in the electronic devices industry; recorded and downloadable software programs for preventing of electronic chipset security risks; Computer software platforms for electronic chipset security and prevention of electronic chipset risks; Downloadable computer software platforms for electronic chipset security and prevention of electronic chipset risks; Downloadable software using artificial intelligence to detect intrusions for preventing of electronic chipset security risks; computer peripherals; diagnostic apparatus for detecting malware | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical evaluations concerning design being engineering services; scientific research; technical research in the field of software development and design; software design and development; computer software installation; computer software maintenance; updating of computer software; rental of software for computer security, cyber security; programming for computers; computer system analysis; computer system design; consultancy in the design and development of computers; Software as a Service (SaaS) featuring software for use in the field of electronic device security; cloud computing, namely cloud hosting provider services; advice regarding information technology regarding electronic device security; server hosting; electronic data storage | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2026 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 21, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 6, 2026 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2026 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 15, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 30, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 29, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |