Drawing for LANNER

USPTO serial 79419885

LANNER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MARTIN, LIEF ANDREW
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 686 means your mark is published in the USPTO Official Gazette and in the 30-day opposition period. If no opposition is filed, prosecution typically continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. Monitor the opposition window. After it closes, watch for Notice of Allowance (intent-to-use) or registration (use-based).

Status 686: Status 686 means your mark is published in the USPTO Official Gazette and in the 30-day opposition period. If no opposition is filed, prosecution typically continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.

Need help with LANNER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert S. Broder

Robert S. Broder Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 Northern BoulevardRoslyn, NY 11576United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Cleaning machines for treating metal chips and grinding sludge, comprised of belt conveyors, and also including tanks, silos, and a washing machine consisting of screw conveyor tanks, downstream centrifuges and a central electronic controller, all for the treatment of metal chips and grinding sludge; crushing machines for the treatment of metal chips and grinding sludge; centrifuges for the treatment of metal chips and grinding sludge; machines for pressing of metal chips and grinding sludge.ACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 15, 2026NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Sep 15, 2026PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 10, 2026OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 9, 2026NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Aug 26, 2026OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 26, 2026OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 19, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 19, 2026GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 19, 2026XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 19, 2026GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 19, 2026CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jun 17, 2026GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jun 17, 2026GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 17, 2026CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 8, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Dec 9, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Dec 9, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Dec 9, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Dec 8, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 8, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 8, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 23, 2025RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 14, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 28, 2025RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jul 28, 2025RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 4, 2025RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 3, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 29, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Mar 29, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 27, 2025REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance