USPTO serial 79425285
VETGDP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NANNEY, KATHERINE N
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 132
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VETGDP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software; software downloadable from the internet; software applications; applications for smartphones; computer software and publications in electronic form supplied on-line from databases or from the internet; software featuring training or educational materials in the field of veterinary services, veterinary medicine and nursing; downloadable electronic publications; electronic publications in the nature of periodicals, books, manuals, magazines, bulletins, course materials and workbooks; instructional, educational and teaching materials in electronic form; video recordings; audio recordings. | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Education; provision of training; tuition, educational and instructional services relating to veterinary services, veterinary medicine and nursing; vocational skills training; workplace based education and training; professional development training; accreditation of professional competency in the veterinary profession; setting of educational and training standards; educational programmes for coaching of veterinary professionals; computer based training; educational services provided online; providing online tutorials and training assessments; information relating to education provided online from a computer database or the internet; providing online electronic publications; provision of information and advice relating to professional development; provision of information, education and advice for veterinary professionals; provision of information and advice relating to the accreditation of professional competency in the veterinary profession. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing online non-downloadable software; providing non-downloadable software featuring training or educational materials in the field of veterinary services, veterinary medicine and nursing; hosting of online facilities for professional development, incorporating the recording of self-reflection on progress and experience. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons
- Other trademarks owned by The Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named VETGDP
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 16, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2026 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 15, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 14, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |