USPTO serial 79425793
SUITEFY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with SUITEFY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service [saas]; software as a service (saas) services featuring software for monitoring, diagnosing and optimizing web application performance, network performance and device performance; platform as a service [paas] featuring software platforms for transmission of images, audio-visual content, video content and messages; platform as a service [paas]; platform as a service [paas] featuring software platforms for transmission of images, audio-visual content, video content and messages; updating and maintenance of computer software relating to computer security and prevention of computer risks; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware and software problems; hosting computer software applications for others; software design and development; software engineering services; designing of computer hardware; hosting of digital content, namely, on-line journals and blogs; hosting websites; hosting computer websites; cloud hosting provider services; hosting of databases; website development services; consultancy services for designing information systems; programming of software for website development; technological consultancy; consultancy services in the field of technological development; monitoring of computer systems by remote access; information services relating to information technology, information technology services, information technology support services, information technology [it] consultancy, software design, software development, software development services. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 7, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 7, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 8, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 24, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 24, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 23, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |