USPTO serial 79426211
STYLIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 649Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, DOMINIC ROBERT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with STYLIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Recorded computer software for AI-based wardrobe management, image recognition for clothing classification, personalized outfit recommendation, fashion e-commerce integration in the field of fashion; magnetic coded card readers; optical readers; motion pictures films about fashion styling and wardrobe optimization, serials being television shows about fashion and musical video recordings recorded on magnetic, optical and electronic media; devices for recording, transmitting or reproducing sound and images, namely, cameras, photocopying machines, televisions, blank videotapes, CD-DVD recorders and players, mp3 players, computers, desktop-tablet computers, wearable technological devices being smartwatches, smart wristbands, head-mounted devices being smart glasses, microphones, audio speakers, headphones; devices and computer peripherals for communication and reproduction purposes, namely,mobile phones, cases for mobile phones, landline telephones, telephone switchboards, computer printers for printing documents, image scanners, photocopiers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, computer programming, computer virus protection, computer system design, design of websites on behalf of others, maintenance of websites on behalf of others, updating of websites on behalf of others, software design, rental of computer software for editing photos, images, artificial intelligence images and updating of computer software, providing internet search engines, hosting computer websites, consultancy in the design and development of computer hardware, rental services of computer hardware; artwork originality verification services in the nature of authenticating works of art; scientific research services; engineering services; engineering and architectural design services; testing of goods/services for quality and standard certification purposes being inspection of icomputers, fast food restaurants, clothing for quality control purposes; design services that are not included in the scope of engineering, architecture and computer services, namely, clothing design services based on artificial intelligence, footwear design services based on artificial intelligence, dress design services based on artificial intelligence, and fashion design consulting services based on artificial intelligence; compute-raided design services; graphic art design services excluding advertising design and landscape design | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2026 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 14, 2026 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| May 14, 2026 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2026 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2026 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2026 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2026 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 14, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 4, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 22, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 12, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 11, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |