USPTO serial 79426716
BURGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BURGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Rice, semolina, cornflour and flours; cereal flakes, cereal snacks; snacks made from cereals; bread, pastry, long-life bakery products, rusks, crispbread, hard cookies; snacks made from pastry; pastries, sandwiches, waffles, confectionery, chocolate, chocolate products, sugar products, marzipan; ice cream, puddings; coffee, coffee surrogate, tea, cocoa, also in extract form; coffee, tea and cocoa drinks; sugar, honey, natural sweeteners; yeast; baking, ice cream and pudding powder; mustard, vinegar, mayonnaise, meat juice, sauces, salad dressings, condiments; salt, spices, preserved kitchen herbs; sandwiches and snacks, both especially with crispbread. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2026 | CRSN | CORRECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2026 | CRCR | CORRECTION CREATED FOR IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 25, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2026 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2026 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 26, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2026 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 9, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2025 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |