USPTO serial 79426793
VENOCCLO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VENOCCLO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Prosthetic tissues for vascular use; glycated hemoglobin measuring apparatus; pulse measuring devices; prosthetic devices for implantation made of artificial materials; biopsy needles; medical devices for measuring biometric data; medical apparatus and instruments other than for dental purposes; test equipment for medical use; test tubes for blood separation for medical purposes; blood analysis apparatus for tumor diagnosis; diagnostic apparatus and instruments for medical purposes; embolization prosthesis for blood vessels; artificial prostheses for blood vessels; prosthetic tissues for visceral use; embolic devices for treating vascular anomalies; blood glucose monitors; blood glucose testing apparatus; blood glucose meters; devices for measuring blood sugar. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 14, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 22, 2025 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 12, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 11, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |