USPTO serial 79428703
MUST MAKE UP STUDIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCDORMAN, ROGER THOMAS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MUST MAKE UP STUDIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Ear-piercing apparatus; hair clippers for personal use, electric and non-electric; hand implements for hair curling; eyelash curlers; crimping irons; pedicure sets; manicure sets; nail files; nail clippers [electric or non-electric]; fingernail polishers, electric or non-electric. | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Abrasive sponges for scrubbing the skin; powder puffs; cosmetic utensils; eyelash brushes; eyebrow brushes; make-up removing appliances; shaving brushes; nail brushes; cleaning instruments, hand-operated. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 1, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 5, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 4, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |