Drawing for PROMISE

USPTO serial 79428764

PROMISE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MTANOS, CHRISTOPHER GEORGE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 135

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROMISE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew D. Witsman

Matthew D. Witsman Foley & Lardner LLP321 North Clark Street Suite 3000Chicago, IL 60654-4762United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Beauty serums; facial and body lotions; facial and body soaps; shampoos; bathing moisturizing, namely, preparations for the skin; nurturing cosmetic vanity products, namely, cosmetic creams and oils; cosmetic treatment products for skin pilling and removing materials from the skin, namely exfoliators and make up removing preparations; protection products all for skin and hair, namely, preparations for sun and heat protection.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 9, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 9, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 9, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 14, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 2, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 16, 2026RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 16, 2026RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 12, 2026RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 11, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 29, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 29, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2025REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance