USPTO serial 79429642
ELB-KEHREN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with ELB-KEHREN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Grinding machines, namely creep feed grinding machines, profile grinding machines, and surface grinding machines; machine tools, namely, grinding machines for metal, ceramic and composite working; tools being parts of machines, namely grinding wheels and tool bits for grinding machines; linear guides namely, linear motion guides being parts of machines;, linear guidance systems comprised of linear motion guides, guide rails, bearing blocks, and linear motors for machines;, controllers for machines, motors and engines namely, electronic controllers for controlling grinding machines; grinding centres being metalworking machines; grinding centres being grinding machines for processing ceramics and composites; grinding spindles being machine parts; flat and profile metal, ceramic and composite grinding machines; Computer Numerical Control (cnc) machines(CNC) tools for cutting and forming of materials; grindstones and rings for grinding machines; machines for metal, glass, ceramic, plastic and semiconductor working and processing, and machine tools therefor; motors and engines (except for land vehicles); machine coupling and transmission components (except for land vehicles); machine parts for all the aforesaid machines, included in this class; accessories for machines, in particular lapping, fine grinding and polishing discs, grinding discs, lapping arbors, lapping rings, polishing rollers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 6, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 11, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2026 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 1, 2026 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2025 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2025 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 11, 2025 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 10, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2025 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2025 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |