Drawing for KURULUS 1867 KEBAPÇI ISKENDER YAVUZ ISKENDEROgLU

USPTO serial 79430581

KURULUS 1867 KEBAPÇI ISKENDER YAVUZ ISKENDEROgLU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 641Office Action
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FICKES, JERI J
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107

What this means

The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.

Status 641: Status 641 means the USPTO mailed a non-final Office Action identifying issues with your application. You typically have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Need help with KURULUS 1867 KEBAPÇI ISKENDER YAVUZ ISKENDEROgLU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marek Krizka

Marek Krizka TRAMA LEGAL, PLLC1178 Broadway, Floor 3New York, NY 10001United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Providing of food and drink; restaurants, take-away restaurant services, cafeterias; cafés, canteen services, cocktail lounges, snack bar services, catering, pubs; rental of food service equipment used in services providing food and drink.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 25, 2026RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 1, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 11, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 11, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 11, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 11, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 11, 2026CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 11, 2026COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2025RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 11, 2025RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 11, 2025RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 25, 2025RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 24, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 25, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 25, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 21, 2025REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance